“A traffic impact assessment is not required.”
Back to evidence libraryEN-0015: The traffic case uses theoretical bowling capacity EN-0015: The traffic case uses theoretical bowling capacity EN-0015: The traffic case uses theoretical bowling capacity EN-0026: The extra parking relies on work coordinated with a separate application EN-0027: The proposal states 151 car bays and four new bicycle spaces EN-0027: The proposal states 151 car bays and four new bicycle spaces
SOURCE PAGE 16
Applicant's planning report in the DA26/1308 package
Page 16. This page comes from the lodged source document.
Cited evidence on this page
These are the short, human-checked passages cited by published Evidence Notes.
“In a fours format, this equates to 96 active players. On a seven game per green basis, the active player capacity increases to 112 active players.”
“The proposal has a fixed active playing capacity of 30 players and one staff member.”
“The additional bays will be achieved by reconfiguring the carpark to the south of the office extension proposed separately by others on the subject site.”
“The proposal will provide 151 car parking bays on the subject site, including five (5) ACROD bays.”
“The proposal also includes four (4) new bicycle parking spaces.”
Tap the page image to open it at full size and zoom in.
