Applicant's claimEN-0015
The traffic case uses theoretical bowling capacity
The applicant compares a fixed padel playing capacity of 30 people plus one staff member with a theoretical bowling capacity of 96 to 112 people and says a traffic impact assessment is not required.
What this does not prove: The comparison does not by itself show actual recent traffic, booking changeovers, concurrent activities or parking spillover.
Primary sourceApplicant's planning report in the DA26/1308 package | Page 16“A traffic impact assessment is not required.”Open the source pagePrimary sourceApplicant's planning report in the DA26/1308 package | Page 16“In a fours format, this equates to 96 active players. On a seven game per green basis, the active player capacity increases to 112 active players.”Open the source pagePrimary sourceApplicant's planning report in the DA26/1308 package | Page 16“The proposal has a fixed active playing capacity of 30 players and one staff member.”Open the source page