Back to evidence library
Applicant's claimEN-0020

The applicant says the tallest courts were moved away from the eastern boundary

The applicant says the three competition-grade courts need extra ceiling height and were placed furthest from the eastern boundary to reduce perceived bulk and scale.

What this does not prove: This is the applicant's design explanation. It does not establish that the resulting impact is acceptable.
Primary sourceApplicant's planning report in the DA26/1308 package | Page 12“The three (3) competition grade courts require additional ceiling height and have been located furthest away from the eastern lot boundary to reduce building bulk and scale as perceived from nearby residential properties.”Open the source page