Back to all issues

Supporting concern

External lighting

Outdoor sports towers would be removed, but feature uplighting is proposed along the eastern frontage. The actual effect at nearby homes should be clear.

Applicant's claimEN-0024

Sports lighting would be removed, but eastern landscaping would be lit

The applicant says the existing outdoor sports towers would be decommissioned and no outdoor sports lighting is proposed. Feature uplighting is proposed along the eastern street frontage.

What this does not prove: The documents describe shielding and a soft light effect but do not provide measured night-time light spill in this note.
Open this evidence note
Shown in documentsEN-0040

The Scheme lists height, noise, access, landscaping and hours as condition topics

The Scheme allows conditions about building height and design, use and noise, access and parking, landscaping, lighting and operating hours.

What this does not prove: Conditions cannot necessarily cure every problem. The Scheme notes that a condition should not change the nature of the application.
Open this evidence note

Questions worth asking

  • What light spill would reach nearby homes after dark?
  • What hours and controls would apply to the feature lighting?

CAMPAIGN POSITION

Refuse DA26/1308 in its current form.

Only if approved anyway: If approved anyway, limit external lighting and require measurable spill controls.