Back to all issues

Process guidance

Making an effective submission

The City's consultation policy explains that submissions must be written, should raise valid planning considerations and are assessed for their issues rather than as a referendum.

Shown in documentsEN-0038

The Scheme makes local amenity and submissions relevant

Local Planning Scheme No. 3 tells the City to consider preservation of local amenity and relevant submissions received on the application.

What this does not prove: This note records two listed assessment matters. It does not determine the weight the City will give either matter.
Open this evidence note
Shown in documentsEN-0042

Policy 6.18 gives different consultation periods for standard and complex applications

Policy 6.18 lists 14 days for a standard application and 28 days for a complex application, unless a longer period is agreed.

What this does not prove: This note does not determine how the City classified DA26/1308 or whether another legal requirement changes the period.
Open this evidence note
Shown in documentsEN-0043

The consultation policy counts some responses from one address separately

The City's consultation policy says responses from the same address are counted individually when signed by different people, unless their content is considered identical.

What this does not prove: The policy does not guarantee that a large number of submissions will determine the outcome.
Open this evidence note
Shown in documentsEN-0044

Development-application submissions must be written

The consultation policy says phone calls, in-person comments and social-media comments are not development-application submissions. It says the City will consider written submissions received during consultation that raise valid planning considerations.

What this does not prove: This note only records what the policy treats as a submission.
Open this evidence note
Shown in documentsEN-0045

The consultation policy excludes property-value and construction-work claims

The consultation policy lists planning rules and matters requiring planning judgment as valid topics. It lists perceived property-value loss and construction-work impacts as non-valid considerations for this assessment.

What this does not prove: This note records the policy's submission categories. It does not make a broader statement about other laws or processes.
Open this evidence note
Shown in documentsEN-0046

Submission numbers are not treated as a referendum

Policy 6.18 says support and opposition counts are not a referendum. Submissions are used to identify planning issues that need consideration and a response.

What this does not prove: Numbers can show participation, but the policy says the issues raised are the focus of assessment.
Open this evidence note

Questions worth asking

  • Has the City applied the correct consultation period and notification area?
  • Has each submission issue been recorded and addressed?

CAMPAIGN POSITION

Refuse DA26/1308 in its current form.

Only if approved anyway: Give affected neighbours a fair opportunity to make clear, individual submissions.